truedemo.blogg.se

Crucial mx300 vs samsung 850 evo for mac
Crucial mx300 vs samsung 850 evo for mac













That works out at about 25 cents per gigabyte. Notes: Longer bars mean better performance. For this reason, in testing, the MX300, though faster than many budget SSDs and significantly faster than any hard drive, was clearly slower than the SSD 850 Evo. Ironically, the Crucial drive is also missing a few crucial features, most notably the ability to customize overprovisioning (a predetermined amount of storage space that's put aside to better the drive's efficiency) and to boost speed by using a host computer's system memory as cache. (Originally, when first released, the MX300 was available in a single capacity of 750GB.) For one thing, the MX300 is available in fewer capacities - 275GB, 525GB, 750GB, 1TB and 2TB - whereas the 850 Evo can be had from 120GB all the way up to 4TB.

crucial mx300 vs samsung 850 evo for mac crucial mx300 vs samsung 850 evo for mac crucial mx300 vs samsung 850 evo for mac

The Crucial drive is quite different from Samsung's, however.















Crucial mx300 vs samsung 850 evo for mac